Yearly Archives: 2007
Game #114 by Noname
11:28, September 19, 2007 by Noname
[Event "Alkmaar tt"]
[Site "Waagtoren-Leiderdor"]
[Date "2007.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Bes,Daan"]
[Black "Van Rijn,Giel"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B48"]
[NIC "SI 40.2.5"]
[PlyCount "83"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Be3 Nf6 7. f3 {In
dezelfde week speelde ik tegen Daan in de interne en adviseerde hem na afloop
van onze partij met dezelfde opening eens de Engelse Aanval te bestuderen, die
bestaat uit de opstelling f3, lange rokade en een pionnenbestorming op de
koningsvleugel. Kennelijk had hij dit advies ter harte genomen.} 7... a6 8. Qd2
b5 9. 0-0-0 Bb4 10. g4 0-0 {Zwart rokeert onbekommerd tegen de storm in, je moet
maar durven. Er zijn hier meerdere mogelijkheden voor zwart. Hij kan met h6 de
aanval afremmen en eventueel op de lange rokade aansturen. Ook komt de
tegenstoor d7-d5 in aanmerking. } 11. g5 Ne8 12. h4 {Ook wit gaat heel
voortvarend te werk. Eerst} ( 12. a3 {om de loper tot een verklaring te
dwingen, kwam sterk in aanmerking.} ) 12... Ba5 $2 {De jeugdige zwartspeler
heeft deze opening nog niet in de vingers, want dit is een zet zonder betekenis.
Een goede zet was } ( 12... Ne5 {Na} 13. h5 Bxc3 14. bxc3 {is zelfs het
grappige } 14... Nd6 15. Bf4 Qc5 {mogelijk.} ) 13. Nb3 Bb6 14. Bf4 Qa7 15. Kb1
{De witte stelling is er inmiddels flink op vooruit gegaan.} 15... f5 $6 {Weer
een opmerkelijke zet. Hier zou} ( 15... d6 {gevolgd door Pe5 meer op zijn
plaats zijn.} ) 16. exf5 Rxf5 17. Bd3 Rf8 18. Be4 Na5 19. Nxa5 Bxa5 20. Be3 Qb8
21. Qd3 $1 {Heel goed gespeeld, vooral uit praktisch oogpunt. Slaan op a8 was
ook goed, maar zou zwart toch tegenspel kunnen geven.} 21... Bxc3 22. Bxh7 Kh8
23. bxc3 {Heel goed getaxeerd. De verzwakking van de witte koningsstelling is
nauwelijks van enige betekenis, terwijl zwart vrijwel machteloos staat tegenover
de dreigende koningsaanval.} 23... d5 {Er is niet veel beter, bijvoorbeeld} (
23... Bb7 24. Bg6 $1 {dreigt h4-h5-h6} 24... Bxf3 25. Rdf1 Qg3 26. Bh5 {en wit
wint.} ) 24. Bc5 Rf4 25. Qg6 Bd7 26. Qh5 Nd6 27. Bg6 Kg8 28. Qh7 Kf8 29. Qh8
{Wit wint in alle varianten, maar } ( 29. Rxd5 $1 exd5 30. Re1 {was het fraaist
geweest. Daan liet zelf na afloop zien dat 29.Lxd6 gevolgd door Dh8+ en Dxa8 ook
heel goed was geweest.} ) 29... Ke7 30. Qxg7 Kd8 31. Qe5 Nc4 32. Qh8 Kc7 33.
Qxb8 Rxb8 34. h5 {Maar ook ze ontgaat wit de winst niet} 34... Rxf3 35. Bd3 e5
36. h6 e4 37. Bxc4 bxc4 38. Kc1 Bf5 39. Bd4 Bh7 40. Be5 Kc8 41. Bxb8 Kxb8 42.
Rdg1 1-0
Game #115 by Noname
07:58, September 23, 2007 by Noname
[White "Kramnik,V"]
[Black "Svidler,P"]
[WhiteElo "2769"]
[BlackElo "2735"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Date "2007.09.13"]
[Event "WCh"]
[Site "Mexico City MEX"]
[Round "1"]
[ECO "D43"]
[Annotator ""]
[Source ""]
[Remark ""]
1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.c4 c6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bxf6 Qxf6 7.e3 Nd7 8.Bd3 g6
9.e4 dxc4 10.e5 Qe7 11.Bxc4 Bg7 12.O-O O-O 13.Re1 Rd8 14.Qe2 {+=} ( 14.Qc2
b6 15.Rad1 Bb7 16.a3 Rac8 17.Ba2 c5 18.d5 exd5 19.Nxd5 Bxd5 20.Bxd5
Nf8 21.Qe4 Ne6 22.Bc4 Rd7 23.g3 Rcd8 24.Rc1 h5 25.Kg2 Bh6 26.Rb1
Rc7 27.a4 Rcd7 28.b3 Bd2 29.Re2 Bh6 30.a5 Rb8 31.axb6 axb6 32.Bb5
Rdd8 33.Ra1 Bg7 34.Raa2 Qb7 35.Qxb7 Rxb7 36.Red2 Rbb8 37.Rxd8+
Rxd8 38.Bc4 Nf8 39.Ra7 Ne6 40.Rb7 Re8 41.Rxb6 Nf8 42.Ng5 Re7
43.f4 Nd7 44.Rb7 Kf8 45.Nxf7 Nxe5 46.Rb8+ {1-0, Anand Viswanathan 2753 -
Dreev Alexey 2690 , Hyderabad 2002 Cup World FIDE (1/2 final)}
) ( 14.Bd3 b6 15.Qe2 Rb8 16.Rad1 Bb7 17.Be4 Nf8 18.h4 Rd7 19.Rd2
c5 20.dxc5 Qxc5 21.Bxb7 Rbxb7 22.Ne4 Rxd2 23.Qxd2 Qe7 24.g4 f5
25.exf6 Bxf6 26.Nxf6+ Qxf6 27.Kg2 Kh7 28.Ne5 Qxh4 29.Rh1 Qf6
30.Qxh6+ Kg8 31.Qe3 Rh7 32.Rc1 Qh4 33.Kf3 Qd8 34.Ke2 Rc7 35.Rxc7
Qxc7 36.Qc3 Qb7 37.Ke3 Qe7 38.b4 g5 39.b5 Kh7 40.a4 Kg8 41.Nc6
Qf7 42.Qe5 Ng6 43.Qxg5 Kh7 44.Ne5 Nxe5 45.Qxe5 Qe7 46.Kf4 Qf8+
47.Kg3 Qe7 48.Qe4+ Kg7 49.f4 Qd7 50.Kh4 Qd8+ 51.g5 Qd7 52.Qe5+
Kg8 53.g6 {1-0, Alekseev Evgeny 2639 - Vitiugov Nikita 2596 , Moscow
6/12/2006 Ch Russia (superfinal)}
) b6 {+0.29 CAP} 15.Rad1 ( 15.Rac1 Rb8 16.Bd3 Bb7 17.Be4 Nf8
18.g3 Rbc8 19.a3 Rc7 20.Red1 c5 21.Bxb7 Rxb7 22.Ne4 Rc7 23.dxc5
Rxd1+ 24.Rxd1 bxc5 25.h4 Nd7 26.Nd6 Nb6 27.Nd2 Rd7 28.f4 Rxd6
29.exd6 Qxd6 30.Ne4 Qc6 31.Rd8+ Kh7 32.h5 Qc7 33.hxg6+ fxg6 34.Rd6
Bd4+ 35.Kh2 Nd5 36.Rxe6 Qb7 37.Qg4 Ne7 38.Nd6 Qd7 39.Qe2 Ng8
40.Qe4 {1-0, Ivanchuk Vassily 2730 - Kramnik Vladimir 2765 , Novgorod 1996
It (cat.19)}
) ( 15.Ne4 c5 16.d5 Nxe5 17.Nxe5 Bxe5 18.dxe6 Bxe6 19.Bxe6 Qxe6
20.Nxc5 Bxh2+ 21.Kxh2 Qd6+ 22.Qe5 bxc5 23.Qxd6 Rxd6 24.Re2 Rad8
25.Rc2 Rd2 26.Rac1 c4 27.f3 Kg7 28.Kg3 g5 29.Rxd2 Rxd2 30.Rxc4
Rxb2 31.Ra4 Rb7 32.f4 Kg6 33.Ra6+ Kh5 34.Kf3 f5 35.Rf6 Rb5 36.Ra6
g4+ 37.Kg3 Rc5 38.Kh2 Rc2 39.Kg3 Rc4 40.Rf6 Rc3+ 41.Kh2 Ra3 42.Rxf5+
Kh4 43.g3+ Rxg3 44.Rh5+ Kxh5 45.Kxg3 a6 46.a3 Kg6 47.Kxg4 Kf6
48.Kh5 Kf5 49.Kxh6 Kxf4 50.a4 a5 51.Kh5 Kf5 52.Kh4 {1/2-1/2, Berczes David
2321 - Erenburg Sergey 2537 , Budapest 13/ 9/2004 It (cat.8)}
) a5 ( 15...Rb8 16.a3 Bb7 17.Ba2 Nf8 18.h4 c5 19.d5 exd5 20.Nxd5
Bxd5 21.Bxd5 b5 22.Qe4 Ne6 23.h5 g5 24.g3 a6 25.Qf5 Nc7 26.Be4
Rxd1 27.Rxd1 Rd8 28.Rxd8+ Qxd8 29.Nxg5 Qxg5 30.Qc8+ Bf8 31.Qxc7
Qe7 32.Qxe7 Bxe7 33.Bb7 c4 34.Bxa6 Bxa3 35.Bxb5 Bxb2 36.f4 Bd4+
37.Kg2 c3 38.Bd3 f6 39.e6 Kf8 40.Kf3 Ke7 41.f5 {1/2-1/2, Korotylev Alexey
2596 - Potkin Vladimir 2540 , Sochi 27/ 4/2004 Ch Russia (club)}
) ( 15...Bb7 16.Ba6 Nb8 17.Bxb7 Qxb7 18.h4 Na6 19.Ne4 Nb4 20.a3
Nd5 21.Rd2 c5 22.dxc5 bxc5 23.Nxc5 Qb6 24.Rc1 Rac8 25.Rdc2 Ne7
26.Rc4 Rd5 27.b4 Rcd8 28.Nb3 Qb5 29.Nbd4 Qa6 30.Qe3 Nf5 31.Nxf5
gxf5 32.Rd4 Rxd4 33.Nxd4 f4 34.Qxf4 Qxa3 35.Nc6 Rd7 36.Kh2 Qd3
37.Rc4 Qd5 38.Rc5 Qd3 39.Qg4 Kh7 40.Rc4 Rd5 41.Rf4 Rd7 42.Rf3
Qe2 43.Qf4 Rc7 44.Re3 Qb5 45.Rc3 Qd5 46.Rc5 Qd3 47.Qc1 Qe4 48.f4
h5 49.Rc4 Qd3 50.Qc2 Qxc2 51.Rxc2 a6 52.Kg3 Bf8 53.Kf3 Rb7 54.Nd8
Rd7 55.Nc6 {...0-1, Bocharov Dmitry 2602 - Dobrov Vladimir 2479 , Moscow
4/ 2/2007 It (open)}
) 16.Bd3 {N} ( 16.Ne4 c5 17.dxc5 bxc5 18.Nd6 Nxe5 19.Nxe5 Rxd6
20.Rxd6 Qxd6 21.Nxf7 Qe7 22.Ne5 Bxe5 23.Qxe5 Kf7 24.Re3 Ra7 25.Qh8
{1-0, Mueller Michael 2210 - Kaczynski Janusz, corr. 1992 Ch Poland (corr.)}
) Bb7 17.Be4 b5 18.h4 Nb6 19.Bb1 c5 {+0.44 Rybka v2.3.2.mp.w32}
( 19...a4 {!?} 20.Bd3 a3 21.b3 b4 22.Ne4 {+0.18 Rybka v2.3.2.mp.w32} )
20.Nxb5 Ba6 21.h5 g5 22.Nh2 {?!} {-0.15 Rybka v2.3.2.mp.w32}
( 22.Bd3 {!?} Nd5 23.g3 Nb4 24.Be4 Rac8 25.a3 Qe8 26.a4 cxd4
27.Nfxd4 Bxe5 28.Bh7+ Kxh7 29.Qxe5 Qh8 30.Nf3 {+0.29 Rybka v2.3.2.mp.w32}
) Rxd4 23.Rxd4 {-0.07 Rybka v2.3.2.mp.w32} 1/2-1/2
Game #116 by Noname
18:37, September 24, 2007 by Noname
[Event "Waagtoren-Leiderdorp"]
[Site "Waagtoren-Leiderdor"]
[Date "2007.09.15"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Bes,Daan"]
[Black "Van Rijn,Giel"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B48"]
[NIC "SI 40.2.5"]
[PlyCount "83"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Be3 Nf6 7. f3 {In
dezelfde week speelde ik tegen Daan in de interne en adviseerde hem na afloop
van onze partij met dezelfde opening eens de Engelse Aanval te bestuderen, die
bestaat uit de opstelling f3, lange rokade en een pionnenbestorming op de
koningsvleugel. Kennelijk had hij dit advies ter harte genomen.} 7... a6 8. Qd2
b5 9. 0-0-0 Bb4 10. g4 0-0 {Zwart rokeert onbekommerd tegen de storm in, je moet
maar durven. Er zijn hier meerdere betere mogelijkheden voor zwart. Hij kan met
h6 de aanval afremmen en eventueel op de lange rokade aansturen. Ook komt de
tegenstoor d7-d5 in aanmerking. } 11. g5 Ne8 12. h4 {Ook wit gaat al te
voortvarend te werk. Eerst 12.a3 om de loper tot een verklaring te dwingen, kwam
sterk in aanmerking.} 12... Ba5 $2 {De jeugdige zwartspeler heeft deze opening
nog niet in de vingers, want dit is een zet zonder betekenis. Goed was 12...Pe5.
Na 13.h5 Lxc3 14.bxc3 is zelfs het grappige 14...Pd6 15.Lf4 Dc5 mogelijk.} 13.
Nb3 Bb6 14. Bf4 Qa7 15. Kb1 {De witte stelling is er inmiddels flink op vooruit
gegaan.} 15... f5 {Weer een opmerkelijke zet. Hier zou 15...d6 gevolgd door Pe5
meer op zijn plaats zijn.} 16. exf5 Rxf5 17. Bd3 Rf8 18. Be4 Na5 19. Nxa5 Bxa5
20. Be3 Qb8 21. Qd3 $1 {Heel goed gespeeld, vooral uit praktisch oogpunt. Slaan
op a8 was ook goed, maar zou zwart toch tegenspel kunnen geven.} 21... Bxc3 22.
Bxh7 Kh8 23. bxc3 {Heel goed getaxeerd. De verzwakking van de witte
koningsstelling is nauwelijks van enige betekenis, terwijl zwart vrijwel
machteloos staat tegenover de dreigende koningsaanval.} 23... d5 {Er is niet
veel beter, bijvoorbeeld 23...Lb7 24.Lg6! -dreigt h4-h5-h6- 24...Lxf3 25.Tdf1
Dg3 26.Lh5 en wit wint.} 24. Bc5 Rf4 25. Qg6 Bd7 26. Qh5 Nd6 27. Bg6 Kg8 28.
Qh7 Kf8 29. Qh8 {Wit wint in alle varianten, maar 29.Txd5! exd5 30.Te1 was het
fraaist geweest. Daan gaf zelf na afloop aan dat 29.Lxd6 gevolgd door Dh8+ en
Dax8 ook heel goed was geweest.} 29... Ke7 30. Qxg7 Kd8 31. Qe5 Nc4 32. Qh8 Kc7
33. Qxb8 Rxb8 34. h5 {Maar ook ze ontgaat wit de winst niet.} 34... Rxf3 35.
Bd3 e5 36. h6 e4 37. Bxc4 bxc4 38. Kc1 Bf5 39. Bd4 Bh7 40. Be5 Kc8 41. Bxb8 Kxb8
42. Rdg1 1-0
Game #117 by Ulrik (svart)
11:27, October 05, 2007 by Ulrik (svart)
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bb5 Nf6
4. O-O Bc5
5. c3 Nxe4
6. Bxc6 Nxf2
7. Rxf2 Bxf2
8. Kxf2 dxc6
9. Qe1 O-O
10. Nxe5 Re8
Game #121 by polish immortal
04:08, October 12, 2007 by polish immortal
1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 e6 4.Nf3 d5 5.e3 c6 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 8.Ne2 Nbd7 9.Ng5? Bxh2+! 10.Kh1 Ng4! 11. f4 Qe8 12. g3 Qh5 13. Kg2 Bg1!! 14. Nxg1 Qh2+ 15. Kf3 e5! 16. dxe5 Ndxe5+ 17. fxe5 Nxe5+ 18. Kf4 Ng6+ 19. Kf3 f4!! 20.exf4 Bg4+!! 21. Kxg4 Ne5+! 22. fxe5 h5#
Game #122 by Polish Immortal (working)
04:11, October 12, 2007 by Polish Immortal (working)
1.d4 f5
2.c4 Nf6
3.Nc3 e6
4.Nf3 d5
5.e3 c6
6.Bd3 Bd6
7.o-o o-o
8.Ne2 Nbd7
9.Ng5? Bxh2+!
10.Kh1 Ng4!
11. f4 Qe8
12. g3 Qh5
13. Kg2 Bg1!!
14. Nxg1 Qh2+
15. Kf3 e5!
16. dxe5 Ndxe5+
17. fxe5 Nxe5+
18. Kf4 Ng6+
19. Kf3 f4!!
20.exf4 Bg4+!!
21. Kxg4 Ne5+!
22. fxe5 h5#
Game #123 by Noname
18:59, October 22, 2007 by Noname
1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. Be2 Bg7 5. Nf3 O-O 6. O-O c6 7. Be3 b5 8. a3 Nbd7 9. Re1 a6 10. e5 Ng4 11. e6 fxe6 12. Ng5 Nxe3 13. fxe3 Nf6 14. e4 h6 15. Nf3 g5 16. Qd3 c5 17. e5 dxe5 18. dxe5 Qxd3 19. Bxd3 Nd5 20. Be4 Bb7 21. Ne2 Rab8 22. Rac1 Ne3 23. Ng3 Nf5 24. Nxf5 exf5 25. Bxb7 Rxb7 26. Rcd1 Rc8 27. e6 Bxb2 28. Rd7 Rcc7 29. Rd5 Rcc6 30. Rxf5 Rbb6 31. h4 gxh4 32. Re4 Rxe6 33. Rg4 Rg6 34. Re4 Rbf6 35. Nxh4 Rg5 36. Rxg5 hxg5 37. Nf3 Bxa3 38. Rxe7 c4 39. Re5 Rg6 40. Nxg5 Bb2 41. Rd5 Bd4+ 42. Kf1 Rf6+ 43. Nf3 Bc3 44. Ke2 Rg6 45. Ng5 Bf6 46. Ne4 Rxg2+ 47. Kf3 Rg6
Game #124 by Noname
01:50, October 23, 2007 by Noname
[Event "ICC 45 45"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[White "Opponent"]
[Black "BDK"]
[Result "0-1"]
1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. g3 f5 {Thanks, Tempo, for suggesting this response to
the English. I love it! He played it horribly, and if I were better I could
have won this game much more convincingly.} 4. e3 Nf6 5. Nd5 {
He's not developing at all and I am almost ready to castle.} Bc5 6. Nxf6+ Qxf6
7. Qh5+ {His queen move seems premature. He has no pieces developed. My plan
at this point is to develop fast, castle queenside, and attack. I never get
the opportunity to castle queenside. I also keep a close eye on chances to
trap that bitch.} g6 8. Qh6 Nb4 {Whatever happened to my plan? Hey, you've
gotta be flexible and this move Fritz likes. If I'm lucky I'll get Nc2 in.
Otherwise I can try d5, followed by Nxd5 if he takes. Plus there is potential
for an outpost on d3.} 9. Kd1 d5 10. b3 {Oops I thought he'd take. Hope chess.}
e4 {To give my Knight a potentially great outpost and keep his bishop from
getting much activity along the long diagonal.} 11. Rb1 Nd3 {? A blunder.
Better is d4, closing off that diagonal and just crunching down on space in
the center. It is also tactially unjustified: Rb1 should have been a clue, but
I completely overlooked the obvious response Bb2! and it nearly cost me the
game. A third problem is that I have moved that knight three times now and I'm
trading it for a Bishop that's doing nothing. So why did I play it? My
thought at the time was that I wanted to get rid of his light-squared Bishop
to take advantage of the weak white-square complex on his Kingside and
eventually expoit it with my two Bishop advantage. A perfect example of
letting planning about subtleties get in the way of thinking concretely about
tactics and more important positional ideas like grabbing the center, two
things that are just killer. Because of this move, I deserved to lose the
game.} 12. Bxd3 exd3 $1 13. Bb2 d4 {Forced, or so I thought. Fritz prefers
Qf8! The best defense should include a threat. Always look for threatening
moves rather than pure defensive moves (HT: Tempo and Glenn Wilson on that
point).} 14. exd4 Bf8 {Bxd4 was my plan, but then I noticed Nf3, and I didn't
want to give up the Bishop pair to Bxd4 Nf3 Bxb3. That would have been better.
I was being greedy, not only with the Bishop pair, but his d pawn becomes a
huge pain the ass.} 15. Qe3+ Qe7 16. Nh3 Qxe3 {I thought this was forced, as I
valued that passed pawn so highly, especially given that it is on the opposite
color of his Bishop and it would take a few tempi for his rook to snag it.
Fritz says no way: get that light-squared Bishop out of there to d7 so you can
castle sooner.} 17. dxe3 {That passed d pawn is funny lookin', and that queen
exchange gives him a beautiful pawn structure.} Bh6 {I spent a ton of time on
this move. I was trying to trap his Knight, but really was it trapped? He
should gladly give me his knight for the Bishop pair and an open file for his
rook.} 18. d5 O-O 19. f4 {Now my Bishops are just inactive.} Re8 20. Kd2 {
Now I'm thinkin, if he grabs that pawn I'll give him some problems with a rook
if I'm able to get that d pawn of his out of the way...} c6 {
Desperately trying to open files for my rooks. My pieces need activity!} 21.
dxc6 bxc6 22. Nf2 Bb7 23. Nxd3 {Giving me a nice opportunity to pin his Knight.
} Rad8 24. Rhd1 c5 25. Ke1 {
? This was probably his downfall. Gives me space to check with my rook.} Bf3 {
I had considered Be4 as well, but I just liked the look of this, keeping the
lanes for both rooks open. But in reality my move sucked, and I should have
checked with my Rook.} 26. Rd2 {? Kf2 avoids all the fireworks that follow. He
just gave me the game, and I was pissed off so I was determined to take the
point.} Rxe3+ 27. Kf2 Rdxd3 {And now it is a matter of time. Major power with
rook batter in his territory, and my dark-squared bishop can now come out into
the game.} 28. Rxd3 Rxd3 29. Re1 Be4 30. Ba3 {Basically giving me a tempo.} Bf8
{Giving me a tempo basically.} 31. Bc1 Bg7 32. Re2 Kf7 33. Ba3 Bd4+ 34. Kf1
Rd1+ 35. Re1 Bd3+ {
His rook is gone and his King will be gone soon, so he resigns.} 0-1
Game #125 by Noname
21:30, November 17, 2007 by Noname
[White "Opponent"]
[Black "Chessaholic"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E67"]
[Annotator "Fritz 8"]
[PlyCount "65"]
1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. g3 d6 5. Bg2 Nbd7 6. O-O O-O 7. d4 {
last book move} Re8 {0.19/13} 8. Bg5 {-0.03/12} e5 {0.19/11} 9. d5 {-0.31/13}
b6 $14 {0.34/12} ({Fritz 8:} 9... h6 10. Bc1 e4 11. Nd4 Qe7 12. Bf4 a6 13. Rc1
Kh7 14. h3 $15 {-0.31/13}) 10. e3 $11 {-0.25/13} ({Fritz 8:} 10. Qd2 $14 {
0.34/12}) 10... Ba6 {0.03/13} 11. b3 {-0.22/14} Rb8 $14 {0.34/13} ({Fritz 8:}
11... h6 12. Bxf6 Nxf6 13. Nd2 Bc8 14. Qc2 a6 15. b4 Qe7 16. h3 Bd7 17. Rab1 a5
18. bxa5 Rxa5 19. Nce4 $11 {-0.22/14}) 12. Nd2 {-0.09/14} b5 $16 {1.13/13} ({
Fritz 8:} 12... h6 13. Bxf6 Nxf6 14. Qc2 Bc8 15. b4 Bf5 16. e4 Bd7 17. f3 a6
$11 {-0.09/14}) 13. cxb5 {1.44/13} Bxb5 {1.16/15} 14. Nxb5 {1.37/14} Rxb5 {
1.06/13} 15. e4 {1.37/12} Nc5 {1.16/12} 16. Qe2 {1.09/12} Qd7 $18 {2.00/12} ({
Fritz 8:} 16... a6 17. Rab1 Qd7 18. Rfc1 $16 {1.09/12}) 17. Rab1 $16 {1.09/12}
({Fritz 8:} 17. Bxf6 Bxf6 18. Bh3 Qxh3 19. Qxb5 Rc8 20. b4 Bg5 21. bxc5 $18 {
2.00/12}) 17... Reb8 {0.84/11} 18. f3 {0.72/12} a5 {0.84/12} 19. Qc4 {0.62/12}
Rb4 {1.00/12} 20. Qe2 $11 {0.00/15} ({Fritz 8:} 20. Qc3 c6 21. dxc6 Qxc6 22.
Be3 h6 23. Rfc1 Qc7 24. Bxc5 dxc5 25. Qxc5 Qxc5+ 26. Rxc5 Rd8 $16 {1.00/12})
20... c6 {0.47/12} 21. dxc6 {0.78/13} Qxc6 {0.75/11} 22. Rfd1 $11 {0.19/12} ({
Fritz 8:} 22. Nc4 a4 23. Bd2 R4b7 24. b4 Ne6 25. Qd3 Nd4 26. f4 Qb5 27. Be3 $16
{0.75/11}) 22... Qb6 $16 {1.25/13} ({Fritz 8:} 22... Ne6 23. Rbc1 Qa8 24. Be3
d5 25. exd5 Nxd5 26. Nc4 Nd4 27. Bxd4 exd4 28. f4 a4 $11 {0.19/12}) 23. Nc4 {
1.47/11} Qb5 {1.69/11} 24. Bf1 {1.19/12} a4 $18 {2.09/11} ({Fritz 8:} 24... Ne6
25. Bd2 Nd4 26. Qe3 Qd7 27. Bc3 Qe7 28. Rbc1 $16 {1.19/12}) 25. Nxd6 $18 {
1.44/11} ({Fritz 8:} 25. Bd2 axb3 26. Bxb4 Qxb4 27. Rxd6 Ne8 28. Rd2 Qc3 $18 {
2.09/11}) 25... Qxe2 {1.19/12} 26. Bxe2 {1.50/12} axb3 {1.25/12} 27. axb3 {
0.78/12} Rxb3 {1.03/14} 28. Rxb3 {1.28/13} Rxb3 {0.97/12} 29. Bc4 {1.28/12}
Rxf3 $2 $18 {4.09/12} ({Fritz 8:} 29... Rc3 30. Bd2 Rc2 31. Bxf7+ Kf8 32. Be3
Nb7 33. Be6 Ke7 34. Nxb7 Kxe6 35. Nc5+ Ke7 36. Rd2 Rxd2 37. Bxd2 $16 {1.28/12})
30. Nxf7 {4.41/13} Kf8 {5.09/13} 31. Nxe5 {5.37/13} Ra3 {6.41/11} 32. Rd6 $2
$18 {3.66/13} ({Fritz 8:} 32. Rd8+ Ne8 33. Nc6 $18 {6.41/11}) 32... Nfxe4 $2 {
#1/2} ({Fritz 8:} 32... Nb7 33. Rxf6+ Bxf6 34. Nd7+ Ke7 35. Nxf6 Nc5 36. Nxh7+
Kd6 37. Nf6 Ke5 38. Bd5 Kd4 39. Bf4 Ra1+ 40. Kg2 Nd3 $18 {3.66/13}) 33. Rd8# {
0.00/0} 1-0
Game #128 by Noname
06:49, November 24, 2007 by Noname
[Event "Yawsuit"]
[Site "www.rychess.com"]
[Date "2007.11.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "redliner"]
[Black "saturatedx"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Mode "ICS"]
1. e4 {i hope john edwards is prosecuting} e5 2. Nc3 c6 {Hey, so you're moving
to Mississippi?} 3. Bc4 {yes indeedy! dec 1.} b5 {Cuh-razy. Need help
moving?} 4. Bb3 {quite possibly yes} Bb7 {Just let us know--} 5. Qf3 {thank
you} b4 {No problem!} 6. Qxf7# {sorry} 1-0 {Well, I deserved that.}